keepyourboehneroutofmyuterus:

newsweek:

This week’s cover story examines the return of the culture wars and how Obama set a contraception trap for the right.

Here’s a preview:

The more Machiavellian observer might even suspect this is actually an improved bait and switch by Obama to more firmly identify the religious right with opposition to contraception, its weakest issue by far, and to shore up support among independent women and his more liberal base. I’ve found by observing this president closely for years that what often seem like short-term tactical blunders turn out in the long run to be strategically shrewd. And if this was a trap, the religious right walked right into it.

Take a look at the polling. Ask Americans if they believe that contraception should be included for free in all health-care plans and you get a 55 percent majority in favor, with 40 percent against. Ask American Catholics, and that majority actually rises above the national average, to 58 percent. A 49 percent plurality of all Americans supported the original Obama rule forcing Catholic institutions to provide contraception coverage. And once again, American Catholics actually support that more controversial position by a slightly higher margin than all Americans, with 52 percent backing it. So on religious-freedom grounds, the country is narrowly divided, but with a small majority on Obama’s side.

And on the issue of contraception itself, studies have shown that a staggering 98 percent of Catholic women not only believe in birth control but have used it. How is it possible to describe this issue as a violation of individual conscience, when no one is forced to use contraception against their will, and most Catholics have already consulted their conscience, are fine with the pill, and want it covered? This is not like abortion, a far, far graver issue. Even the church hierarchy—in a famous commission set up by Pope John XXIII to study birth control—voted to allow oral contraception under some circumstances, only to be controversially vetoed by Pope Paul VI in 1968. And the truth is, there is no real debate among most actual living, breathing American Catholics on the issue, who tend to be more liberal than most Americans. They long ago dismissed the Vatican’s position on this. And after the sex-abuse scandal, they are even less likely to take the bishops’ moral authority on sexual matters seriously.

Read the whole thing by picking up a copy on newsstands tomorrow, on iPad today—or just read it on the Beast right this minute.

I’m not going to read this because I don’t read anything Sullivan writes. 

Really, Newsweek? You all were like, “We need someone to write a story on reproductive rights and birth control” and put your collective heads together to pick ANDREW SULLIVAN? 

LOLWUT?

[Update: there are multiple reasons I don’t like Sullivan. Here was the latest dust up surrounding the guy. The link is from Gawker, unfortunately, but it is succinct. Also, with the grain of salt one should always lend to it, here is the wikipedia page about his political stances.]

fuuuck sullivan. newsweek creates a platform to address sex politics and selects andrew sullivan, how thoroughly ridiculous.  also read “plus: the teenage hysteria epidemic.” ahhh yess the patriarchal obsession with hysteria… 

(via keepyourbsoutofmyuterus)